December 9- 13, 2005
Lucknow, India

Name:

Mr Benton Musslewhite



Mr Benton Musslewhite

Designation

President

Organization/Institution

One World Now

Country

USA

   

Short Biography

With Masters of Law Degree from Georgetown University Mr Benton Musslewhite is President of an NGO, One World Now, founded by him in 1992. He served as a law officer in the US Army before switching over to practicing International Law in environmental, maritime and mass disaster cases. He was involved in Bhopal disaster and Chuck Kam Choo cases. He won the Chuck Kam Choo cases in the Supreme Court of the United States. He was appointed as an advisor to national council on Physical Fitness and as a member of Advisory Board of the area Re-development Administration.

Presentation

Charter Amendments For A Real U.N. Judicial System

            Thank you for the honor of speaking to this august body of judges from around the world.  As an international trial lawyer, it is very rare that I am presented with the opportunity to lecture judges rather than the other way around.  I only hope that I am up to the challenge of inspiring each of you to join the crusade I am about to describe.

            As President of One World Now, I am, with many others from many of the Nations in the world, spearheading a vigorous movement to bring about a new, or comprehensively amended, Charter of the United Nations.  It is our irrepressible goal to create a United Nations that is democratized and empowered so that it can effectively deal with the crises we are facing in this century.  Collectively, these crises signal a not so subtle descent into brutal times.  You know, as well as I do, what these crises are: wars, proliferating weapons of mass destruction and global terrorism; persistent hunger and extreme poverty, with over a billion human beings living on less than $1 per day; increasingly severe natural disasters; climate change, continued pollution of the oceans, disappearing rain forests and contamination of our rivers, lakes, air, soil and wetlands; pandemics such as AIDS and Avian Flu; brutal genocide, human trafficking, and other human rights abuses; excessive population growth in some countries and ominous depopulation and loss of sperm counts in other nations; unstoppable soil erosion and desertification; the disgrace of over 30,000 children dying each day from hunger, malnutrition and preventable diseases; and the terrible consequences being inflicted upon the world by our insane habit of throwing over a trillion dollars a year down the black hole of arms, war and killing each other.

            These global, interconnected, worsening and converging crises have humankind approaching the Rubicon and they must be confronted now. To wait any longer is to invite disaster.  Indeed, there is a gathering storm of these crises, a “creeping Armageddon,” that is ominously overtaking us. 

            But, how does human society save itself from itself?  Do we just continue to rely upon the Nation-State system and the international anarchy in which we live?  Cannot we now see that the Nation-State system – which has been with us since the Treaty of Westphalia, and which has just taken us through the bloodiest and dirtiest (pollution-wise) century in the history of human-kind – simply is not capable of dealing with these crises?  And is it not clear that the United Nations, as presently constituted – with no real power in the General Assembly and with the single-nation veto in the Security Council – is also incapable of dealing with these global threats to our survival?  I do not see how we can avoid the conclusion that the world must turn to a global structure of governance that does have the power to take the necessary action for our own salvation.

            One World Now has been working for the last 13 years to determine what the vehicles are for creating the kind of democratized and empowered structure of governance we must have and we have concluded that there is only one such vehicle and that is the United Nations itself.  This is because the United Nations is the only global structure with a built-in legitimization process, Article 109.  Simply stated, Article 109 provides for a three-step mechanism for legally creating a structure of global governance.  

            Now, comes the hard part.  If we can generate a Charter Review Conference under Article 109, what kind of new Charter do we need?  Clearly, the core principles must be these:

1.   The first is that the U.N. must be democratized; “we the people” must have real meaning through a legislative body that is, as Abraham Lincoln put it, “of the people, by the people and for the people.”

2.   The second is that the new United Nations must have the power to enforce the laws adopted by it.  

3.   Third, perhaps the most important is that the new United Nations must be a “government of law, and not of men.”  This means that the rule of law must be embedded in the new Charter with regard to all of its functions and the new Charter must provide for a “real” judicial system.  By “real”, I mean the following:

a.   First, the system must include trial courts, an intermediate level of appellate courts and the Supreme or World Court, which will be the court of last resort. 

b.   Second, those trial courts and appellate courts must be placed around the world so that the courts are accessible to the people.

c.   Third, the rulings and decrees of this court must have the force of law and must be enforced.

d.   Fourth, these courts must not only have jurisdiction to interpret and enforce the laws of the United Nations but it must have the jurisdiction to resolve disputes between Nations and their subordinate political bodies; between citizens of one Nation against citizens of another; and between citizens of the same Nation where the court system of that Nation refuses or fails to provide a court for the adjudication of the dispute in question.

e.   Fifth, the jurisdiction of the U.N. Courts must be compulsory – that is, no Defendant will have the discretion to reject jurisdiction, as the United States did before the World Court when it was sued by Nicaragua for mining its harbors during the Iran-Contra episode.

f.    Sixth, the new U.N. should create a “Judicial Task Force” to work with national judicial systems around the world in an effort to improve them and make them more efficient, just and expeditious.  As I have found in my work as an international trial lawyer, the judicial systems in many countries need to be improved.  I don’t believe I need to tell any of you this.

      In the first place, the absence of an expeditious trial or resolution plagues too many court systems in too many countries – taking anywhere from 5 to 10 to 15, even 20 years to complete the resolution of civil cases.  And we all know what the U.S. State Department, and its Country Reports, say about corruption in the court systems of many countries I don’t necessarily agree with all of these Reports and, I will say this – we have a more subtle form of corruption in many of the American court systems.

      But, the point is that, while we all believe that the rule of law is absolutely necessary if we are going to have a just and equitable global society, that “rule” must be efficient, expeditious and honest.  After all, no one can deny the principle that “justice delayed is justice denied.” 

      So, the U.N. “Judicial Task Force” will have its work cut out for it.  And will have to go about that work with sensitivity, making certain that it does not offend the Nation States, whose judicial system it is seeking to improve.

g.   Seventh, and most important, I want to say something that many of you may appreciate.  The a new U.N. Court system should, I believe, provide for jury trials in civil, as well as criminal cases.  I know that this will be a new experience for most of the world, as far as civil cases are concerned, because, except for the United States and a few provinces in Canada and Australia, presently no jury trials are allowed in civil cases in the other Nations of the World.

      But, the right of trial by jury is a precious right that all World Citizens should have.  Having a “jury of one’s peers” to resolve the facts of a case is so important to a fair and just adjudication.  You, as Judges, know that when you are required to decide the facts of the same types of cases over and over again it is difficult not to become jaded and to give a fresh and objective view to each new similar case.

            In any event, I hope all of you, as Judges, will join us in our efforts to generate an Article 109 Charter Review Conference.  And, once the Conference is called, I invite each of you then to help us get adopted a Charter that will bring about a democratized and empowered U.N., with the kind of judicial system that I have just suggested.  As Judges, you are very respected in your communities and in the Nations in which you serve and your support will be crucial to the success of our efforts.  It is through just such efforts that I hope we can attain that noble goal of global governance and, through such governance, bring about a global society where we can all live together in a world without war, without oppression, without poverty and without the environmental decay that now afflicts us.

   

Organized by
World Movement for Global Democracy (WMGD)*
*an initiative of City Montessori School (CMS), Lucknow, India